🐈‍⬛ Are All The Teachers Speakers

The New York Office of Children and Family Services requires that all child care staff complete a minimum of 30 hours of training every two years addressing all of the following ten topics: Principles of childhood development, focusing on the development stages of the age groups for which the program provides care. Nutrition and health needs of Cross References. 1 Corinthians 12:28. And in the church God has appointed first of all apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then workers of miracles, and those with gifts of healing, helping, administration, and various tongues. 1 Corinthians 12:30. [单项选择题]The speaker, a teacher from a community college, addressed a sympathetic audience. Heads nodded, in agreement when he said, "High school English teachers are not doing their jobs." He described the inadequacies of his students, all high school graduates who can use language only at a grade 9 level. The total of all the Okinawan speakers is somewhere around 100,000. 2014: Most speakers are over the age of 50 and are bilingual in South-Central Okinawan and Japanese. all: Japanese "'Language nest' is implemented at the community level, though the government has issued statements that it is certainly not opposed." all We will train you as a creative teacher so that to teach the children to be elite.You will do your best at work, we will cherish your dedication and help you to develop your strengths. Even if you are no longer an nine to fiver office worker, you still enjoy 18 days of public holiday, 14 days of annual leave and sick leave.Do not treat teachers Every kid needs a champion. Rita Pierson, a teacher for 40 years, once heard a colleague say, "They don't pay me to like the kids." Her response: "Kids don't learn from people they don't like.'". A rousing call to educators to believe in their students and actually connect with them on a real, human, personal level. 06:40. According to the National Education Association, Indiana teacher pay ranked 42nd in the nation in the last school year, and since 2011, pay has declined by 10% in constant dollar terms. The American Federation of Teachers released a report in July with recommendations to fix the teacher shortage. They include reducing the focus on standardized All-New Echo Dot (5th Gen, 2022 release), $50. Amazon. The new Echo Dot comes in three colors: charcoal, deep sea blue, and glacier white. It’s also available for purchase with a battery base Lysa Allman-Baldwin I am a Professional Speaker, Workshop Facilitator, and Author offering leadership strategies that promote authentic and purposeful living. sU7Ac. By Last updated February 9, 2022 Are Native English Teachers Better Than Non-native? The 4 Biggest Myths Some years ago, a colleague told me something that’s stuck with me for almost 15 years Non-native English teachers are better than native-speaking teachers. He was British. The rest of our group was comprised of Americans, an Australian and myself, a Canadian. To my surprise, everyone agreed. I expected some type of debate defending native teachers’ prowess, but no! The discussion was centered around the experiences non-native teachers tend to go through in order to actually become teachers. I was young and relatively inexperienced, so I just sat there and listened. Fast-forward 15 years later, and I’ve come to appreciate the wisdom in my colleague’s comment. There are many reasons that non-native English speakers can be just as competitive and skilled as native speakers—and can even offer knowledge to their students that native speakers never could. Unfortunately, not everyone recognizes this yet. So in this post I’ve distilled four common myths about native English speakers’ supposed superiority over their non-native counterparts, and discussed why they’re not always true. Whether you’re currently looking for an English teaching job abroad or you need some motivation as a non-native English teacher, we’ll show you why you’re just as valuable as the native English teachers out there. Download This blog post is available as a convenient and portable PDF that you can take anywhere. Click here to get a copy. Download Myth 1 Schools Always Prefer Native Teachers Doesn’t it seem like just about every school advertises job openings specifically for native speakers? You’ll often find schools advertising their openings for teachers from the Canada or Australia. Overseas recruitment focuses heavily on hiring native speakers for teaching positions, even if they have little to no experience. But don’t let those job advertisements scare you out of applying. While it’s true that schools often do seek native teachers, the reality is that for many schools this is mainly a marketing technique. With some native speakers on staff, schools can impress parents and charge more for tuition. In reality, native speakers with minimal teaching experience are often given part-time “teaching assistant” positions. For the real teaching jobs, at the end of the day, many schools will hire the most experienced and qualified teachers out there… regardless of where they’re from. Often, that means passing on native teachers who don’t have the skills, experience and qualifications. Finally, look closely, and you’ll often find advertisements seeking teachers with “native-like” fluency. That means you qualify as long as you’re fluent in English at a native-sounding level. Try using those search terms on job sites to find employers who aren’t exclusively hiring native speakers. Myth 2 Native Speakers Teach the Language Best You might assume that native-speaking English teachers are inherently better at teaching the language. After all, since they’ve spoken English all their lives, they have an intuitive knowledge of how it works. They don’t need to memorize grammar rules or stay up-to-date on slang. That sounds like it’d be hard to beat. But the reality is that qualified non-native educators can teach English concepts just as well, if not better, than natives. First of all, non-natives understand what it’s like to learn English, having already done it themselves! You’ll be able to anticipate students’ problems and share solutions that worked for you. Not only will this benefit your teaching, but it’ll also help you bond with your students. Non-native speakers have generally also studied the grammar and mechanics of the English language in a more focused way than native speakers. While an English speaker might inherently know grammar rules, non-native teachers can actually explain those rules, so students fully understand and remember them. Myth 3 Native Speakers Know More About English Culture Similar to the myth above, you might think that native speakers know English culture best because they grew up in it. For example, a native teacher could explain what’s considered polite in, say, a business setting. Or they could easily share songs, books and other media that their family and friends love. These arguments make total sense, but they also apply to non-native teachers. Nowadays, information is shared constantly across the world through movies, TV and the internet. Maybe you grew up listening to exactly the same rap or rock music as a native speaker who grew up in the Plus, you might have an even broader understanding of English-speaking cultures! Maybe you had a pen pal from the watched Hollywood movies from the and studied in Australia. That means you understand three different, unique cultures and probably picked up a huge variety of English slang. In a way, non-native teachers can give their students a “heads up” about living in an English-speaking country and provide lessons that, frankly, native teachers would never be able to. Unlike a native speaker, you’ll know what parts of English culture are totally confusing and can share your advice to overcome those obstacles. This is indeed valuable for students who might not have any idea what to expect. Myth 4 Native Speakers Provide the Best Role Models You may worry that native speakers provide the perfect model for ESL students. They can demonstrate English pronunciation, accents and intonation that non-natives might not be able to. But being a role model for your students isn’t just about perfect speech in English. In many ways, a skilled non-native teacher is a much more realistic and helpful model for students learning English—especially if the teacher is from the same background as their students. As we mentioned above, since non-native teachers have been through the process of learning English themselves, they have a natural feel for what works and what doesn’t. This can be especially important for beginner students who need more direction in their studying. And for all students, a non-native teacher proves that fluency is possible if they just work at it. Ultimately, a local, non-native teacher may prove to be the best model of all since they represent the fluent English speaker their students can truly aspire to become. News flash non-native English teachers are just as effective as native-speaking teachers! Since that conversation some years ago, I’ve become aware of how successful non-native teachers of English can truly be. I’ve had many colleagues who’ve proven to not only handle language appropriately, but also demonstrate a genuine desire and passion for teaching. And while there are native speakers who make a concerted and whole-hearted effort to teach at their best, there’s really no definitive distinction between natives and non-natives. Essentially, it boils down to this good teachers will be good teachers and bad teachers will be bad teachers. Is there always room for improvement? Of course, no one is perfect. Even after 19 years of teaching I realize there’s always something new to be learned. Download This blog post is available as a convenient and portable PDF that you can take anywhere. Click here to get a copy. Download This article is a preview of The Tech Friend newsletter. Sign up here to get it in your inbox every Tuesday and out, we can’t reliably detect writing from artificial intelligence programs like ChatGPT. That’s a big problem, especially for worse, scientists increasingly say using software to accurately spot AI might simply be latest evidence Turnitin, a big educational software company, said that the AI-cheating detector it has been running on more than 38 million student essays since April has more of a reliability problem than it initially suggested. Turnitin — which assigns a “generated by AI” percent score to each student paper — is making some adjustments, including adding new warnings on the types of borderline results most prone to first wrote about Turnitin’s AI detector this spring when concerns about students using AI to cheat left many educators clamoring for ways to deter it. At that time, the company said its tech had a less than 1 percent rate of the most problematic kind of error false positives, where real student writing gets incorrectly flagged as cheating. Now, Turnitin says on a sentence-by-sentence level — a more narrow measure — its software incorrectly flags 4 percent of investigation also found false detections were a significant risk. Before it launched, I tested Turnitin’s software with real student writing and with essays that student volunteers helped generate with ChatGPT. Turnitin identified over half of our 16 samples at least partly incorrectly, including saying one student’s completely human-written essay was written partly with stakes in detecting AI may be especially high for teachers, but they’re not the only ones looking for ways to do it. So are cybersecurity companies, election officials and even journalists who need to identify what’s human and what’s not. You, too, might want to know if that conspicuous email from a boss or politician was written by have been a flood of AI-detection programs onto the web in recent months, including ZeroGPT and Writer. Even OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT makes one. But there’s a growing body of examples of these detectors getting it wrong — including one that claimed the prologue to the Constitution was written by AI. Not very likely, unless time travel is also now possible?The takeaway for you Be wary of treating any AI detector like fact. In some cases right now, it’s little better than a random a good AI detector exist?A 4, or even 1 percent error rate might sound small — but every false accusation of cheating can have disastrous consequences for a student. Since I published my April column, I’ve gotten notes from students and parents distraught about what they said were false accusations. My email is still open.In a lengthy blog post last week, Turnitin Chief Product Officer Annie Chechitelli said the company wants to be transparent about its technology, but she didn’t back off from deploying it. She said that for documents that its detection software thinks contain over 20 percent AI writing, the false positive rate for the whole document is less than 1 percent. But she didn’t specify what the error rate is the rest of the time — for documents its software thinks contain less than 20 percent AI writing. In such cases, Turnitin has begun putting an asterisk next to results “to call attention to the fact that the score is less reliable.”“We cannot mitigate the risk of false positives completely given the nature of AI writing and analysis, so, it is important that educators use the AI score to start a meaningful and impactful dialogue with their students in such instances,” Chechitelli key question is How much error is acceptable in an AI detector?New preprint research from computer science professor Soheil Feizi and colleagues at the University of Maryland finds that no publicly available AI detectors are sufficiently reliable in practical scenarios.“They have a very high false-positive rate, and can be pretty easily evaded,” Feizi told me. For example, he said, when AI writing is run through paraphrasing software, which works like a kind of automated thesaurus, the AI detection systems are little better than a random guess. I found the same problem in my tests of Turnitin.He’s also concerned that AI detectors are more likely to flag the work of students for whom English is a second didn’t test Turnitin’s software, which is available only to paying educational institutions. A Turnitin spokeswoman said Turnitin’s detection capabilities “are minimally similar to the ones that were tested in that study.”Feizi said if Turnitin wants to be transparent, it should publish its full accuracy results and allow independent researchers to conduct their own research on its software. A fair analysis, he said, should use real student-written essays on different topics and writing styles, and address failure on each subgroup as well as wouldn’t accept a self-driving car that crashes 4 percent — or even 1 percent — of the time, Feizi said. So, he proposes a new baseline for what should be considered acceptable error in an AI detector used on students a percent false-positive will that happen? “At this point, it’s impossible,” he said. “And as we have improvements in large-language models, it will get even more difficult to get even close to that threshold.” The problem, he said, is that the distribution of what AI-generated text and human-generated text looks like are converging on each other.“I think we should just get used to the fact that we won’t be able to reliably tell if a document is either written by AI — or partially written by AI, or edited by AI — or by humans,” Feizi said. “We should adapt our education system to not police the use of the AI models, but basically embrace it to help students to use it and learn from it.”A question before you goIt’s one of the scourges of online life Have you ever been misled by what you suspect is a fake online review? I’m talking about the types of reviews you find on Amazon that recommend a product that falls apart after you buy it — or the type you find on Yelp that praises a doctor who turns out to have a totally icky bedside manner?If you’ve got a story to tell about shady reviews, I would love to hear about your experience. Send an email to content is taking over social media. Here’s how to banish content is taking over social media. Here’s how to banish to drink less in 2023? These habit-tracking apps can to drink less in 2023? These habit-tracking apps can long, lonely wait to recover a hacked Facebook accountThe long, lonely wait to recover a hacked Facebook account Teachers is the plural for teacher. Teacher’s is the singular possessive form of teacher. Teachers’ is the plural possessive form of teachers. Teachers or teacher’s or teachers’ are all pronounced the same use teachers when we want to make the word “teacher” it isI have one have two teachers. Teacher’s Teacher’s is the singular possessive form of teacher. We use the possessive form of teacher when we want to show that one teacher owns is my teacher’s need to look after our teacher’s we are talking about only one teacher. You can replace teacher’s with a name if that makes it easier to is John’s need to look after John’s Teachers’ is the plural possessive form of teachers. When the noun already ends in “s” and we want to make the word possessive, we need to put the apostrophe after the “s”.This is the teachers’ this case, many of our teachers use this room to prepare for classes and have spoken English, it can be difficult to know whether you are talking about one teacher or many teachers in the possessive because teacher’s and teachers’ sound exactly the it teacher’s or teachers’ birthday?Teacher’s birthday is usually correct because it is the birthday of one teacher. Is it teacher’s or teachers’ day?Teachers’ day is correct because we are talking about teachers in the it teacher’s or teachers’ lounge/room?Teachers’ lounge/room is correct because we are talking about teachers in the it teacher’s or teachers’ union?Teachers’ union is correct because we are talking about teachers in the PostsConor is the main writer here at One Minute English and was an English teacher for 10 years. He is interested in helping people with their English skills and learning about using tools at work.

are all the teachers speakers